Save to Retire: Pre-tax, After-tax or Roth?
Optimal Tax Environment to Save for Retirement (continued)
Compare Pre-tax 401(k) to After-tax Roth 401(k) considering distributions from the Pre-tax 401(k) at: 25% MTR, 15% MTR and 33% MTR
| Age | Pre-tax 401(k): $10k/5 yrs @7% |
25% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
15% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
33% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
Roth 401(k): $7.5k/5 yrs @7% |
Tax-free Distribution |
| 40 | $10,350 | $7,763 | ||||
| 41 | 21,425 | 16,068 | ||||
| 42 | 33,274 | 24,956 | ||||
| 43 | 45,953 | 34,465 | ||||
| 44 | 59,520 | 44,640 | ||||
| 66 | $263,698 | $197,774 | ||||
| 83 | 255,942 | -19,661 | -22,283 | -17,564 | 191,957 | -19,661 |
| 84 | 0 | -19,661 | -22,283 | -17,564 | 0 | -19,661 |
| Total | $353,901 | $401,088 | $316,152 | $353,901 |
This analysis yields that the individual receives the same total distribution from either account if her MTR is static. However… if her future MTR decreases, the pre-tax option is preferable; if her future MTR increases, the Roth option is preferable. Learn more about tax brackets versus tax rates
The numerical results are only one piece of the “optimal tax environment to save for retirement” puzzle. For this individual, it’s significant to learn that her future MTR may determine if the pre-tax or Roth is preferable, but it’s not necessarily conclusive. Perhaps this requires further analysis, for example…
What is the outcome if she contributes $10,000 to the Roth 401(k)?
Compare $10,000 contributions for 5 years to both the Pre-tax 401(k) and the After-tax Roth 401(k) considering distributions from the Pre-tax 401(k) at: 25% MTR, 15% MTR and 33% MTR
| Age | Pre-tax 401(k): $10k/5 yrs @7% |
25% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
15% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
33% MTR Aft-tax Distribution |
Roth 401(k): $10k/5 yrs @7% |
Tax-free Distribution |
| 40 | $10,350 | $10,350 | ||||
| 41 | 21,425 | 21,425 | ||||
| 42 | 33,274 | 33,274 | ||||
| 43 | 45,953 | 45,953 | ||||
| 44 | 59,520 | 59,520 | ||||
| 66 | $263,698 | $263,698 | ||||
| 83 | 255,942 | -19,661 | -22,283 | -17,564 | 255,942 | -19,661 |
| 84 | 0 | -19,661 | -22,283 | -17,564 | 0 | -19,661 |
| Total | $353,901 | $401,088 | $316,152 | $353,901 |
This analysis yields that the Roth 401(k) is preferable if her MTR is static, decreases or increase; however… this analysis is flawed.
Comparing outcomes from a $10,000 contribution to both the pre-tax 401(k) and the Roth 401(k) is not sound. Contributing to the Roth 401(k) costs the individual $13,333, not $10,000 since the 25% tax is payable up front Roth 401(k) contribution ($10,000 contribution/1 – 25% (tax rate) = $13,333). Therefore…
A sound analysis also considers distributions from an after-tax savings account, or “side fund,” in which the individual invests the after-tax proceeds ($2,500) of the additional $3,333 that it costs to fund the Roth 401(k) [($13,333 - $10,000) (1-25%) = $2,500]. Confused? Consider the following…
Assume the individual’s annual W-2 income is $13,333, that she’s paid once per year, and she can contribute $10,000 to either pre-tax or Roth 401(k).
| Contribute $10,000 to Roth 401(k); pay stub indicates: |
bbb | Contribute $10,000 to Pre-tax 401(k); pay stub indicates: |
||
Gross Pay: |
$13,333 |
Gross Pay: |
$13,333 |
|
| Roth 401(k): | -10,000 | Pre-tax 401(k) | -10,000 | |
| Pay check before tax: | $ 3,333 | Pay check before tax: | $ 3,333 | |
| 25% tax on $13,333 | -3,333 | 25% tax on $13,333 | -833 | |
Net Pay check |
$ 0 |
Net Pay check |
$ 2,500 |
|
When the analysis considers this information, the outcome may surpise you.
Copyright © 2009 Barry R. Milberg All Rights Reserved